Expert Evidence in Hong Kong Arbitration
A View from the Tribunal, Counsel and Experts
- Date
- Monday 9 November 2026
- Time
- 9am UK / 5pm HK
- Where
- Online, 90 minutes
Expert evidence decides many construction and infrastructure disputes in Hong Kong. In this session six speakers look at it from four seats: the tribunal, counsel, the client and the expert. The tribunal must weigh the evidence; counsel instruct and test it; the client pays for it; and the expert gives it. Each speaker answers the same two questions. What do you want from the expert? What do you not want?
The talks start with the Hong Kong framework: the Arbitration Ordinance, the HKIAC 2024 Rules, the IBA Rules and the CIArb Protocol. They then turn to what an expert needs from the legal team, and to how a contractor chooses and pays for experts. Counsel's segment runs from instructions to cross-examination, and the last looks at recent cases on independence, conflicts and the use of AI. This site follows the talk segment by segment, with every authority cited in full and linked, a checklist of what each side wants from its expert, and the slides.
The panel
- Philip Boulding KCKeating ChambersChair and moderator
- Simon Hughes KCKeating Chambers
- Peter BrogdenKeating Chambers
- Mercy MilgoKeating Chambers
- Mike AllenManaging DirectorSecretariat
- Ben BuryDirector, General CounselGammon Construction Limited
The running order
- 00What is really required?Philip Boulding KC5 min
- 01The frameworkSimon Hughes KC10 min
- 02The expert's viewMike Allen10 min
- 03The client's viewBen Bury10 min
- 04Counsel's viewPeter Brogden10 min
- 05When it goes wrongMercy Milgo10 min
- 06Panel discussionPhilip Boulding KC25 min
- 07Your questionsPhilip Boulding KC10 min